Commitment

What have we committed to?  We have committed to a lifestyle that will not sustain us.

Human influence on the climate system is clear, and recent anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are the highest in history … The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, and sea level has risen … Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions … (are) driven largely by economic and population growth … Many aspects of climate change and associated impacts will continue for centuries, even if anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases are stopped.  (Source:  IPCC 5AR, SPM)

Global CO2 Emissions

(Source:  IPCC 5AR, SPM http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/)

The more pressing question is, how will we wrench ourselves from this unhealthy commitment?

Limiting climate change would require substantial and sustained reductions in greenhouse gas emissions … Adaptation and mitigation are complementary strategies for reducing and managing the risks of climate change … Effective decision making to limit climate change and its effects can be informed by a wide range of analytical approaches for evaluating expected risks and benefits, recognizing the importance of governance, ethical dimensions, equity, value judgments, economic assessments and diverse perceptions and responses to risk and uncertainty.  (Source:  IPCC 5AR, SPM)

According to Dawn Stover, a Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists columnist, “The world needs an emissions diet plan—and a full complement of socio-economic incentives and support systems to ensure its success.”  (Source:  http://thebulletin.org/climate-change-irreversible-not-unstoppable8044)  Stover says that this statement is about as helpful as telling an obese person that eating less will yield weight loss.

Perhaps we must start with a stark assessment of our most ugly trait – aggression.  According to Stephen Hawking, “The human failing I would most like to correct is aggression … It may have had survival advantages in caveman days, to get more food, territory or a partner with whom to reproduce, but now it threatens to destroy us all.”  (Source:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/23/stephen-hawking-aggression_n_6733584.html)

Stephen Hawking

What if we were willing to commit a drastically different lifestyle, one that will sustain us?  A lifestyle that elevates the concept of commitment to one another and to our life-sustaining planet?  Let’s start by defining commitment:

  • a promise to do or give something
  • a promise to be loyal to someone or something
  • the attitude of someone who works very hard to do or support something

(Source:  http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/commitment)

Are we capable of nurturing a healthy commitment to ourselves, to each other, and to our planet, or must we develop a legal and enforcement system that protects us from ourselves?  Perhaps we are due another visit from Klaatu.

Klaatu

(Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaatu_%28The_Day_the_Earth_Stood_Still%29)

©Taryn Fisher 2015

Rustic Crust Thrives

Picture1

Brad Sterl, owner and CEO of Rustic Crust, is a man of his word.  Directly following the fire that destroyed his factory on March 6, 2014, Brad promised his entire staff, both perms and temps, that they would remain on the payroll while he rebuilt.  And rebuild he did – this weekend Brad celebrates by hosting an open house at his brand new, bigger and better manufacturing facility.

Brad says, “I’ve never seen my glass as half empty.”

http://www.concordmonitor.com/home/15851251-95/rustic-crust-to-celebrate-opening-of-new-facility-in-pittsfield-with-open-house

https://www.facebook.com/RusticCrust

Go New Hampshire!

People Using Business As A Force For Good

On January 2, 2015, New Hampshire joined 25 other states and the District of Columbia in passing Benefit Corporation Legislation, a legal corporate status for businesses that meet higher standards of corporate purpose, accountability and transparency. This allows businesses to write their greater purpose into the DNA of the company, and requires the business to publish an annual report assessing their overall social and environmental performance.

This bill was sponsored by Senator Molly Kelly and others.

Cultivating Conversation at the Cafe

I launched this blog as a way to sort and evaluate thoughts and feelings about sustainability.  It seems these days that debate about what to do quickly becomes unproductive; either we reactively defend our turf or we shut down, not knowing how to tackle the big beast.  Doing so, we extinguish the opportunity to collaboratively discover a better way forward.

I always attach images to my posts.  For me, images evoke emotions, leading me to see things differently, causing me to think new thoughts.  Van Gogh’s Café Terrace at Night underscores the simplicity yet significance of taking the time to relax, perhaps with a shared bottle of wine under a starry sky, of making space to talk and listen and feel and think.

Vincent Van Gogh - Cafe Terrace at Night (1888)

In an interesting article, Feeling, Art, and Sustainable Civil Society, Elizabeth C. Herron, essayist, poet, and collaborative artist, explores connections not typically made.  She defines a society as civil when the ideals of community are valued and nurtured and when citizens take into account the common good of all life on earth.

Herron argues that art has the potential to transcend the chasm between opposites, and that the process of feeling requires time and space for reflection.  The din of our daily lives steals precious time needed to talk and listen and swallows elusive space needed to think and feel.  The gadgets upon which we depend create distance and foster anonymity.  Anonymity leads to apathetic misunderstanding.  A world lacking empathy is a world populated by distant strangers who don’t understand or care about one another.

Herron writes:  Empathy takes place through imagination, that is, through image.  When we lose touch with the vision of the imagination, we lose our capacity to connect with one another … Image is the link between self and other … a more inclusive level of consciousness enables a feeling of care and concern for diverse and distant life … we recognize with compassion the other within and so no longer view the stranger as alien … The recognition of ourselves as interdependent within a multiplicity of interrelated systems, which together form a whole, leads to a consciousness that includes other species, forests, bodies of water, and people on the far side of the world whom we have never met.

Simply put, humanity is not everything; we are but a small part of a much larger whole.  A challenge to overcome is the multiplicity of perspectives that we vigorously defend rather than lovingly treasure as the warp and weave of a shared existence.  Art can play a greater role in our conversation, helping us to sense things as both separate from yet representative of ourselves.

A shift is needed.  Sustainability is not about saving the earth but instead exercising an expanded empathy that includes all earth’s occupants (animate and inanimate) who must share earth’s finite resources in order to survive.  Perhaps we can engage in this conversation about the big picture if it’s put before us in paint or poetry or pastorale.

Herron writes:  Images of art can guide, inspire, and educate us.  In the clarification of values, the role of art is as important now as it was when early people painted the walls of Pleistocene caves and held ceremonial dances on those cool clay floors.  She says that art refreshes our appreciation for the ground beneath our feet, beneath the detritus of civilization, and that through art it becomes possible to imagine a sustainable world, one in which we see ourselves as interdependent in a nonhierarchical web of living systems, each essential for the survival of all.  This, she says, is essential for the survival of civil society.

I concur.

©Taryn Fisher 2013

A Moral Imperative: JFK takes a stand

Fifty years ago today, on June 11, 1963, General Henry Graham, the head of the Alabama Guard (which had been federalized by President John F. Kennedy) ordered Alabama Governor George Wallace to stop blocking two black students, James Hood and Vivian Malone, from entering the University of Alabama’s Foster Auditorium to register for classes.

That evening, President Kennedy informed citizens across America via a televised address that he was sending a federal civil-rights bill to Congress.  During his address, he said, “I hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents …  We are confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the scriptures and is as clear as the American Constitution.”

For JFK’s full address:  http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/detail/3375

For other speeches on Civil Rights:  http://www.history.com/speeches/john-f-kennedy-on-desegregation-at-ole-miss#john-f-kennedy-on-desegregation-at-ole-miss

Image

Photo courtesy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cSrvqYKQH8

A few hours later, Medgar Evers, a World War II veteran and civil-rights activist, was assassinated.

Image

Photo courtesy en.wikipedia.org

It’s critically important that desegregation was framed as a moral issue.  Doing this put the onus on every American citizen to do the right thing:  support this cause with both words and actions.  JFK argued that a problem this significant could not be solved through legislation alone.  He said, “It must be solved in the homes of every American in every community across our country.”

The same holds true for the issue that we face today:  environmental degradation.

We are consuming natural resources faster than the rate of  replenishment.  We are stripping the earth to satisfy our needs and wants and leaving behind a path of pollution.  Environmental degradation is an issue of such magnitude that we – each and every one of us, living in every corner of the world – must act.  We must consume less and do so less harmfully, and we must ensure the replenishment of extracted natural resources upon which our survival depends.

This is neither a partisan issue nor one of corporations versus individuals.  It is, however, an issue that requires us to work together to achieve a goal greater than ourselves.  We must redirect our efforts away from argument and toward collaborative action.

Image

Photo courtesy http://www.history.com

©Taryn Fisher 2013

Today is Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution Day

Food Revolution Day on May 17, 2013 is a global day of action for people to make a stand for good food and essential cooking skills. It’s a chance for people to come together within their homes, schools, workplaces and communities to cook and share their kitchen skills, food knowledge and resources. Food Revolution Day aims to raise awareness about the importance of good food and better food education for everyone by focusing on three simple actions – cook it, share it, live it.

http://edibleschoolyard.org/resource/food-revolution-day-2013

Image